Different tempi for different types of chants

Todd Flowerday writes about the importance of correct tempo for music, and cites an overly slow tempo as a major reason why Gregorian chant doesn’t capture a parish’s imagination. I agree completely. My opinion of most renditions of Gregorian chant is that they skew toward the slow side, especially for the more melismatic propers.

Because the Church has asked for full participation in the Mass Ordinary, dialogues and responses, a slower tempo (2 notes/second) would be justified for these. This same tempo also would be justified for propers from the Graduale Simplex and plainsong hymns such as Adoro Te and Pange Lingua which are meant for wider sung participation. Additionally, it’s my very strong belief that a faster tempo (up to 4 notes/second!) better serves the Gregorian propers (which are not necessarily suited for wide participation, save perhaps the Communio) and psalm-tone chants. The actual tempi will be dependent on the acoustics of the chapel or church in which the chant is being sung.

Take, for example, the chant after which this site is named, Cantemus Domino [ gif ], the post-Exodus tract for both the 1962 and 1970 Easter Vigil. It takes this choir 2:12 to complete the antiphon and one verse. Under the quicker tempo proposed, it would take at most 2 minutes to complete the entire chant. (My own private readings of it have it at 1:50.) Granted, in the 1970 Missal and the 2002 General Instruction, the example given is superseded in preference by the responsorial psalm from the Lectionary (whose settings take anywhere from 1:45 to 2:15), but it still serves well enough for illustration purposes. One of these days I’ll record my own rendition of this same chant and post it for comparison.

If the ordinaries, propers and hymns are successfully pulled off at these tempi, at the very least it would dispel the notion that chant is boring, when in fact it is very much alive. Chants executed this way may be able to facilitate a more active interior participation amongst the more restless elements of the congregation. And for those whose time is a premium, you may still have a complete Mass celebrated in under an hour.

Of course, it requires the chanters to possess a ready familiarity with the neums, the chants, and each other to be able to sing the propers at such a clip and still have it sound unhurried, while at the same time maintaining a prayerful state. And that takes time to develop—a couple of years, at least.

Does anyone know of any publications that advocate a quicker tempo for the chant in general, and the propers in particular? As far as I know, the Liber Usualis is silent on this issue, and the modern chant books have no guidelines on the chant at all.

Leave a Reply




*Required. E-Mail will not be published.


*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

4 Comments

i can’t help you on the guidelines for tempo front, i’m afraid. my choir always tended toward the slow side - but we also followed the schola st grégoire/solesmes method, which is much more contemplative and fluid than other schools of chant. last winter i heard a schola sing in paris, and the rhythm was so quick (and certain neumes, to my understanding, poorly interpreted) that the chant sounded almost mozarabe or byzantine. it was a bit unsettling, though beautiful in its own way.


No matter what chant we are working on, the problem is the same in each case. We move too slow when we are first learning one, dragging out phrases and hanging onto notes too long. In this stage, we are still working with the text and getting a sense of the meaning and phrase. In this stage, attempting speed and agility is really rather hopeless. It only becomes muddy and the singers adopt an imitative pose that doesn’t lend itself to clarity later on.

But as we get to know the chant, the opposite problem presents itself: tendency to burn through the line as it becomes clearer and the phrase takes on it own shape. We find that in this stage it becomes necessary to impose a rather strict tempo in oder to slow it down so that it doesn’t sound too zippy or frenetic but rather retains its inner peace and discipline. It is only at this stage, when we can adjust the speed at will and create a different sensibility with each singing, that we feel that we truly know the chant and it is ready to sing.

Then of course the final stage comes: the liturgy. And here the tempos in reality turn out to be dictated by the space and feel of the liturgy of the day–how much silence the celebrant permits, the general mood of the space, the integration with the other music, and many other factors that just can’t be fully anticipated.

This is why it is so necessary to spend as much time as possible on the chants ahead of time, and there is never ever enough time. Ideally, we like to them sound and feel like music that has been memorized so that the ear can sense where the phrase is going at every step. Whether that is fast or slow really depends on so many factors.


Very interesting thread.
This is a topic that has interested me, and like you, I can’t find any written guidance, though the conventional wisdom (from those I consider wise,) is that the tendency is to sing the chant too slowly.
I should add, conventional wisdom from these same sources is that Catholics sing nearly EVERYTHING too slowly.
I came to music ministry from a professional theater background, and I have had to fight my near-frantic tendency to pick up cues and to idolize “pace” absolutely tooth and nail.
But the lugubrious tempi I hear virtually EVERYWHERE in this country (it doesn’t matter whether in a more traditional or more contemporary music program — Hali Mary Gentle Woman and the Lourdes hymn are both dirges, and soupy, swoopy dirges, at that, at most parishes,) lead me to believe that my fault is less common than its opposite.
The church where I now pray has incredibly live acoustics, and a long decay, (and all the priests drag unconscionably,) so the method at which I have arrived for chant, (and which seems to work,) is to take fairly brisk tempi, but break phrases wherever even remotely possible and make the pauses a bit longer than those I hear on the various CDs that I have, or those taken by the Gonzaga or John Cantius or Ars Antiqua or Renssalaer (sp?) groups/scolae/WHATEVER I admire and have been lucky enough to hear in person.
And as I said, it seems to be working.
(Though I should admit that I know that the lady who keeps asking why we don’t sing “Angel’s Wings” very often any more would not agree.)


From June 1999 to August 2003, I was organist and choirmaster at Holy Name of Jesus Church in Providence, which has two Masses in English, and one Tridentine Mass. The Tridentine Mass was High Mass year round, except for Summertime and most Holy Days of Obligation.

The Ordinary was usually VIII, with Credo III (we used Mass XVII during Advent and Lent). Though singing from the pew was optional in 1962, many did sing.

Anyways, we did not so much vary in tempo, but in organ registration. Unlike most parishes I knew that played much of the chant on 8′ stops at best, I did this:

KYRIE:
8′4′ flutes on great on first Kyrie; 8′ strings/celeste on swell on second; 8′4′ flutes with 8′ principal on great on third.
Same with the triple Christe
First two of the last triple Kyrie was as the first triple Kyrie, then add a 4′ principal on the final.

GLORIA:
8′4′2′ on great up to “Domine fili unigenite Jesu Christe”
play 8′4′ on swell from “Domine Deus, Agnus Dei” to “Qui sedes ad dextera Patris, miserere nobis”
back to 8′4′2′ on great for the remainder, and add chorus reed for Amen

CREDO:
similar pattern to the Gloria, with the part on swell going from “Et incarnatus est” to “et homo factus est”, back to great on “Crucifixus etiam pro nobis”

SANCTUS:
well-registered 8′4′2′ on great, with swell spots being “Pleni sunt caeli et terra gloriam tuam” and “Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini”.

AGNUS DEI:
rather mellow - pattern similar to the Kyrie:
1) 8′4′ flutes on great
2) 8′ strings/celeste on swell
3) great flutes, plus 8′ principal (add 4′ on “dona nobis pacem”)

Tempos were not rushed by any means on any of these chants. My successor pretty much keeps the same tempos I did. My predecessor, OTOH, went way too fast, IMHO. The congregation seemed to really like the interpretation we used.

BMP


A Musical Journey through GIRM