Catholic Church Music, forty-eight years later (Part X of a series)

The last part of Chapter Three of Paul Hume’s Catholic Church Music talks of the difficulty of cultivating music worthy of the liturgy, due mainly to lack of support, “from the top”. Here are some gems.

I thought wistfully about the standing-room-only concerts I have attended in Protestant churches one night recently when a fine new Catholic organization called the St. Cecilia Choral Society gave its first concert. Some of the town’s best Catholic musicians were singing that night and the performance was splendid–greatly enjoyed by the forty people who had crowded into the church to hear it. (Four of the forty were the working press and their wives.) Notable by their absence were any representatives of the hierarchy, or for that matter, any clergy at all except the curate of the parish who officiated at Benediction.

The support and encouragement that our Catholic choirse and composers need in order to prosper must come down from the top.

The musical naivete which characterizes too many eccelesiastical authorities today exerts a particularly painful influence on the serious composer who wishes to use his talents for the glory of God and the Church….

An authoritarian music commission can do damage to the progress of Church music if it is unwilling to investigate music contemporary in style as well as chronology.

Leave a Reply




*Required. E-Mail will not be published.


*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

2 Comments

In the few but fine books I’ve read about one of my favorite composers, Gabriel Faure’, it’s often lamented that Faure’ s professional duties prevented him from composing more. I have no basis for doubting it. Nevertheless, I wonder how receptive his diocesan chancery (or whatever the admin organization) was to the idea that he could pensioned off completely, say, during the summers, to write. Did they know what they had, in him? etc.


Evidently not. Here are two paragraphs from Jessica Duchen’s biography (Phaidon):

“Faure’s Requiem was first performed at the Madeleine for the funeral of a well-known architecht… After the ceremony, the priest summoned the choirmaster [Faure'] and demanded: ‘What was that mass for the dead you’ve just conducted?’ Faure’ explained that it was his own work. ‘Monsieur Faure’,’ sighed the priest, ‘we don’t need all these novelties: the Madeleine’s repertoire is quite rich enough.’

One can imagine the frustration that Faure’ must have felt, working alongside the questionable musical judgment of his employers. The Madeleine’s repertoire comprised a range of works both contemporary and of earlier eras, but its emphasis was on neither quality nor spirituality. Eager to please the fashionable clientele, the clergy’s musical preferences included the occasional Latinization of an extract from Gounod’s Faust, or the meditation from Massenet’s opera Thais. When Saint-Saens had performed his own arrangement of Liszt’s St. Francis of Assisi Preaching to the Birds, one of the clergymen had thought he was tuning the organ. The real church music of his peers did not impress Faure’ inordinately… [snip] Faure’s own austere preference was in fact for plainsong — in a later interview he declared that in his opinion the church should have no music but plainsong.”

What an extraordinary coincidence.


A Musical Journey through GIRM