Catholic Church Music, forty-eight years later (Part II of a series)
Chapter 1 of Paul Hume’s Catholic Church Music, titled “Music in the Church”, is divided into three parts. The first part acknowledges that, while progress was made in Catholic church music in America since the turn of the twentieth century, it had not been as rapid as the rise of secular music. He also states that progress in improving sacred music is at a crossroads.
It can continue to climb. Or it can continue to meander in circles on its present plateau. And on this level the excellent achievement of so many individual Catholic musicians is obscured by the apathy and mediocrity that presently have a stranglehold on the music of the Church.
Hume tells of the rise in prominence of the liturgical movement of the twentieth century, first spearheaded by Pope St. Pius X’s motu proprio Tra le sollicitudini, noting that
The increasing interest of the laity in the liturgy has caused a corresponding growth of interest in the problems of sacred music. Once considered the exclusive preserve of the clergy and the Church musician, music has lately become a real concern to the layman (both ecclesiastically and musically speaking) who now feel more and more that what goes on in the choir loft is not only his business but his responsibility.
Thoughts:
- The musical plateau spoken of probably wasn’t too high, based on the state of music described by Thomas Day in his book Why Catholics Can’t Sing. If the plateau is lower today, it isn’t lower by much.
- Monsignor Martin Hellriegel’s good work in reviving the liturgy surely must have been on Hume’s mind when writing this book, as well as other similar efforts.
- If a layman today feels that what goes on in the choir loft is not only his business but his responsibility, he should make it his business to read up on the documents concerning sacred music.
Leave a Reply
8 Comments
>If a layman today feels that what goes on in the choir loft is
>not only his business but his responsibility, he should make it
>his business to read up on the documents concerning sacred
>music.
The solution to bad music is to read more documents? How about agitating for better music among church leadership, not to mention the musicians? Of course, if you go to a church whose only music leaders are three-chord types, they won’t know what you’re talking about (”Giovanni WHO?”).
Perhaps what is meant is that “documents concerning sacred music” can be used to point out to church leadership what exactly should be going on in the liturgy, if the latter is to remain faithful to the Roman rite as it has been practiced for rather a long time. Given statements made in these documents, such an approach would, in fact, be “agitating for better music.”
They don’t take long to read, and they’re very well-organized. If you read them online at the Vatican’s website, the footnotes are even hyper-linked to other documents, so you needn’t dig very hard.
Regards,
Anthony
I’m not a Catholic, so forgive this Protestant for intruding. I would be interested in finding those documents. What is the Vatican’s site, and can you put a hyperlink to the documents? We Protestants are suffering at the hands of political correctness and lack of musical education too. My church is one of the few in my denomination that still thinks music should be taken seriously in the context of worship.
I just realized my last post was in response to a 2004 comment. If anyone else stumbles across this and has the info I need, please let me know. Thanks!
Here is the Vatican site in English (I can’t do hyperlinks, I’m a technidiot, but maybe someone else will, or you and cut and past it.)
http://www.vatican.va/phome_en.htm
But again, as a technidiot, I find it easier to access the documents from sites like this one you are on:
http://www.cantemusdomino.net/browsing_library/church_documents.php
or:
http://www.ewtn.com/vlibrary/search.asp
or
http://adoremus.org/ChurchDocs.html
May I ask what denomination?
Presbyterian (PCA). We are not the “big” Presbyterian denomination, which is PCUSA, but both are probably in the same situation. For instance, another church that for a while had a “mixed service” has recently installed a plexi-glass-enclosed drum set. ‘nuf said.
Thanks for the links. I have a lot of books and articles on “the music debate,” but many of the documents I just glanced at seem well written and well stated. There is a lot of reference to the protection of the “dignity” of the liturgy and worship. I should get many hours of good reading here. Now, if I can just get “us protestants” to work on that stained glass thing…
” Now, if I can just get “us protestants” to work on that stained glass thing…”
Well, you know the welcome mat’s always out for you across the Tiber ![]()








![[Bench Pressus]](http://www.cantemusdomino.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/bench-pressus-ad125x125.gif)
![[Colossians 3:16]](http://www.cantemusdomino.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/colossians-316-ad125x125.gif)




Last 5 Comments