"Sacred music must possess holiness, musicians told"

A report on a February 2000 Gregorian chant workshop given by Msgr. Bernard Rossi for parish musicians in the Archdiocese of Vancouver.

Noteworthy quote from the Monsignor:

We make a mistake when we think there should be no choir because all the congregation should sing everything. The result is either nobody sings anything or some people sing everything badly. Rather, the choir should lead and inspire.

Leave a Reply




*Required. E-Mail will not be published.


*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

8 Comments

Peace, all.

Most Masses in the world have no choir. While I wouldn’t quibble that a choir makes liturgy better, you have to realize that the parishes that do have choirs do not have them at every Mass. If the choir should lead and inspire, is that a goal only for the Big Mass on campus, or for every liturgy?


Todd, in traditional language, there was High Mass and Low Mass, and even other categories signifying differing levels of solemnity. Even in the New Rite, clearly, when the Ecclesia worships on Sunday morning, that is the summit of Christian worship, and the music that accompanies it ought to be the best we can offer - to “inspire” - so that during Masses of lesser solemnity, we can recall the reality and “actively participate” internally even when the higher solemnity is absent. Without the valleys, how can anyone ever appreciate the peaks? Low Mass allows us to see what sticks from our experience of the High Mass. No, you don’t need a choir at every Mass to appreciate the value of having one; and I believe the Monsignor’s words were not intended to be taken as all-or-nothing.


“there was High Mass and Low Mass, and even other categories signifying differing levels of solemnity”

This is a distinction I wish might find new life.
I grew up thinking “high mass” meant the choir mass, and had no notion of the distinction between liturgical music and other sacred music.

The church choirs in which my parents sang were likely to sing the Ambrosian Gloria one week , a Gloria by Schubert the next; Praise to the Lord at one point during the mass and “The Palms,” at another and a Hovahness motet at another.

This was after VCII, and the nuns who taught private school (and Religious ed to those of us in public school,) down the street, had a guitar mass with Glory and Praise, which I despised, but purely on aesthetic grounds (not that I even knew the word, which I still cannot spell, but there’s no cultural snob as intractable as a 10 year old.)
All of it was very well sung, most of it was very good — and only some of it was appropriate, I came to understand.
There was also a great deal of really well rendered instrumental music.

I don’t recall ever going to a Mass with no music at all, even on a weekday. This may be true to some extent, becasue on weekdays we would be likely to go to a monastery, where the cloistered nuns sang exquisitely (different nuns!) but I suspect this is faulty memory.

But now for the last two decades, during which I have done a great deal of traveling, I found it was common for parishes to have one “silent mass,” one mass with four songs tacked on, and one mass with a great deal of singing, either supported by a choir, or mostly performed by one.
Those that featured performances seemed slightly, but only slightly, more likely to feature a contemporary ensemble than a traditional one.
However, the contemporary ensembles seemed drastically more likely to delude themselves that the assembly was singing along with them.

I laud and endorse the notion that no Sunday mass should be be entirely without singing (and I don’t buy the interpretation some put on the the rubrics that it is an entire Sunday’s worth of masses that should not be devoid of singing, rather than any given individual Sunday mass.)

But I can feel the palpable resentment of the 7:00 am regulars when they are asked to sing “One Bread, One Body,” and I can hear them, (heck, I can hear myself,) thinking “Oh no, not THAT Gloria, in THAT key, with THAT high note at THIS time of morning.”

And I think theri resentment is well founded.

I think they deserve to have their (nearly) silent mass returned to them.

Have the priest enter simply, with a bell to announce him. Sing a simple psalm response to a psalm tone (no Minnesota Trinity soupy arpeggios and aren’t-we-clever? chromatics.)
Sing a chanted Allelluia (any deacon or priest can chant the verse recto tono.) Sing the Eucharistic acclamtions in the simplest setting you can find.

AND LEAVE IT AT THAT!


Peace, Geri.

I appreciate your sensibility on this point, and believe me, I’ve heard it, too. However, the new IGRM would seem to move against any regular notion of “silent” Mass, at least where music is concerned.

I would like to think that every Sunday Mass should be a High Mass, as it were, and I work get my parish going in that direction. If I didn’t believe in singing from the pew, I would have found another more edifying musical outlet decades ago.


We have choirs at both of our Sunday masses. Their purpose it to lead in and inspire to worship. We sing more than most Catholic parishes in America (my personal opinion).


I really appreciate Geri’s perspective here, and enjoyed working with her at a recent parish mission (If this is the same Geri in recent blogosphere).

Hey Phil, we sing everything, but in the parish where we did that the parishioners now think that it was all stuff “Fr. Jeff added” since my successors did not continue it.

This Sunday I am singing everything from the Sign of the cross at the beginning to the blessing at the end.


Yes, Fr. Keyes, same old same old.

My personal preference is no spoken words at all, sing everything that must be pronounced aloud and have big gobs of silence in between to allow for contemplation. (One of the things I loved about the Byzantine church where I used to be a regular, hearing ALL the scripture chanted, epistle, Gospel, everything…. stunning.) Then a choral postlude that makes your heart feel like it’s going to burst with the beauty of it followed an organ peice that’ll damage the foundation of the building.
But I know there are people who would prefer less music, and I don’t think SONGS should be foisted on them. They should be asked to sing Mass, but people should stop trying force them to sing AT Mass. (And I’m even-handed on this, or at least as even-handed as someone as opinionated as myself can be — an exquisite marriage of Herbert’s words and Vaughan Williams tune has no greater right to intrude on those who would prefer less singing than does a piece of Rory Cooney drek.)


Yes, Geri, the preference is to really sing the liturgy. But, in order to do that, we need to have priests who are able AND willing to do that. In the meantime, we strike a sometimes-happy medium.


A Musical Journey through GIRM