Now is this really necessary?
Society for a Moratorium on the Music of Marty Haugen and David Haas
While we’re at it, I suppose we could seek a moratorium on the use of the St. Gregory Hymnal, too. Bad music is bad music, regardless of the era. Or composer for that matter—masters aren’t above producing clunkers occasionally, and the pedestrian composer can produce a ‘hit’.
Update 2004.04.15: Okay, okay, I joined. But for fun (nod to Geri), not to actually promote a written moratorium. The moratorium will not be written on stone tablets, but on hearts.
[Via A Saintly Salmagundi and The Curt Jester.]
Leave a Reply
17 Comments
If there is anything really wrong with the texts (remember, texts always come first) or the music of the St. Gregory Hymnal (1920, 1940, 1966, or 1979?), Don Gu and I should like to hear about it. Perhaps you meant to refer to some hoary old version of the (as opposed to the New) St. Basil Hymnal. In any case, please remember that large vernacular parts of these hymnals were explicitly devotional at a time when popular devotions were popular, a Good Thing whose revival has very recently received official encouragement. I would like to start a society against conflating the entire universe of Christian spirituality and its music, much less all liturgy, office hymns and all, into the Holy Mass, which, again, generally has only one hymn. (In Lent, it has not even one, unless you are sticking up for the poor recently-abandoned Sanctus.) And only one theme.
Even if there were anything to complain about, I should think that there were more pressing concerns than to attack what must be G.I.A.’s worst-selling (and least-expensive) hymnal.
Speaking of least-expensive, there is a moral and economic difference between flashy marketing of newly-invented texts (approved as canonic only by usually-anonymous editors) of hot Christian stars and reprinting public-domain settings of Catholic liturgical and devotional texts by composers whose hairstyle we have never been aware of.
Hmmmmm……Yes.
I agree with you that things like this are a bit silly. I have done my share of denigrating the works of Marty Haugen, but we’re not going to change anything by being whiny and bitter and mean. We’ll change things not by putting a moratorium on Haugen and Haas, but by showing the people something better.
Not necessary, but fun, perhaps? (It gave me a needed laugh after the zillionth forced listening to “Now We Remain.”)
Daniel, I love to read your posts.
Yes, my first thought when I read that comment on the St. G was that for all its problems (which are so obvious today) it has fanastic material of enduring value–it only needs to be used with care. In many ways, it’s wonderful. Most modern hymnals pale by comparison. In any case, the St. G would have vanished long ago if a suitable replacement had become readily available. Lacking that, I’m glad it’s still in print.
In fact, we’ve found a few good hymns in OCP that have no 4-part backup in OCP materials (not at all unusual) so we ended up using St G alongside OCP for a nice choral arrangement (with some adjustments to take out period-specific Amens, e.g.).
Before posting this, I checked the GIA site and see that they do offer one copyright 1979. I have no idea what this one looks like. My own experience is with the Neumann Press reprint of the 1941 edition. So perhaps that explains everything.
If I may suggest, there is already such a Society as that mentioned above in existence. It is the society of those many people, myself included, who no longer go to Latin Catholic masses because they find the experience of such music to be painful to them. I would not be surprised if a fair number of those who have left the Roman Church have done so because of the banal and unsingable music which the two named above have perpetrated upon an unwilling people.
It has been years since I have willingly gone to a modern Roman liturgy, because of such noise as that mentioned above. I had thought that the Episcopal Church was safe (although I had not visited such churches in a long time), but at the funeral of a friend of mine (a juvenile diabetic who died untimely at 50 of a heart attack secondary to his disease), I attended an Episcopal funeral service in which a guitar group provided the so-called music. It was tolerable until they began the “Sanctus”, to music which for the first 12 bars was identical to the theme song from the motion picture and television series “MASH”. Unfortunately, the title to that song, which was running through my head at the time, was “Suicide is Painless.”
I believe that His Holiness, John Paul II, is absolutely correct in reiterating earlier Catholic teaching that Roman liturgical music is best when it resembles Gregorian Chant. Most of the attention paid has been on the meditative and transcendent style of the music. Overlooked, but equally of value, is the fact that Gregorian Chant takes as its texts either Scripture (the Psalms especially), or hymns written by Saints who have been spiritually informed by Scripture, Tradition, and the teaching authority of the Church. Liturgical music becomes banal and, in fact, poisonous, the farther away the musical texts which inform it depart from Scripture and the hymns of the saints.
As such, I am happy to dwell among the Eastern Catholic churches, where I am able in the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom to be fed with the riches of Scripture, Tradition, and Church Authority. It saddens me that the rational sheep in most modern Roman churches are not so fed.
Bernard, I spent several years attending an Eastern Rite Catholic church for five or sixth months out of the year when, because of my work, I found myself in an area or Florida where the Roman Catholic parishes played awful ’songs,’ engaged in colored lighting effects to ‘highlight’ various parts of the Mass, and ‘enhanced’ the Eucharistic Prayer with dreadful background music.
It was a welcome temporary refuge, but God willing, things are getting better and it will not be necessary ever to make it permanent.
(It’s been a while since I attended an Episcopalian service, but I sang at a Methodist funeral a few months back and found myself trying to apologize to the music director who was bemoaning the “Catholic junk” that had invaded their hymnal.)
Miss Geri,
You are very sweet to a curmudgeon.
Mr. Tucker,
The 1979 St. Gregory is the “Abridged Edition: Unison, Two and Four Voice Choirs with Organ Compiled by Carroll Thomas Andrews.” It has no new music and in fact very little new typesetting; I would say that almost if not all of it is therefore in the public domain. The 163 mostly but not overwhelmingly Latin selections, despite the 1966 copyright gratuitously applied to the front page, are on the whole from the (1920 and) 1940 edition. I think that it is a nice selection and probably useful as an ancillary choir book, and, as you can see, the organ accompaniment is included. Available spiral bound for a dollar more.
However, if you have the complete 1940/1941 edition, you have at least 96% if not all of the music in this abridged edition.
Mr. Brandt,
Come back home to the Latin rite and do your part! What about the Anglican Use? Check out the new DVD from Our Lady of the Atonement in San Antonio! I was disappointed that all the music was congregational (except for a stray Agnus Dei during Communion!), that it was outwardly a very “common” Sunday (the propers seem to be from Christ the King), and that I could not see myself in the congregation (I must have been there the following weekend). Still, after attending Mass there hundreds of times and singing in the choir just a little less often, I definitely had to stay up past my bedtime the very first night I had the DVD.
“Okay, okay, I joined. But for fun (nod to Geri), not to actually promote a written moratorium. ”
Well done!
You are such a good sport, I will go get out my trusty Gather hymnal and play and sing a medley of “Sing Hey! For the Carpenter!” and “You and I are the Bread of Life” in your honor.
(Okay, I’ll need a couple of Sidecars first, I think….)
Dear Geri and Mr. Muller:
Thank you for your comments. As regards Geri’s comments that “things are getting better”, it really depends upon where one is, or more particularly, in which diocese one dwells. I have heard good things taking place in Oakland and San Francisco, where a friend of mine was ordained as a priest in the Dominican order. The ordination Mass, and my friend’s first Mass, were interwoven with Gregorian chant, polyphony, and sound modern hymns, in accordance with Vatican II’s “Musicam Sacram”. It was a moving, beautiful, and unfortunately, a rare experience for me.
Not so in Los Angeles, where I live. While matters here are in some ways getting better (e.g., I recently attended a part of a weekday mass during Lent at the new Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels, and heard a nice english chant setting of the Our Father, Proulx’s “Sanctus” and “Communion Acclamation”, and even the Agnus Dei in the tone proper to weekdays in Lent [or funerals]; the liturgy was marred only by a communion song out of “Worship and Praise”, at which point I left to go back to research at the County Law Library), in some ways, things are getting worse (e.g., St. Charles Borromeo Church, where Paul Salamunovich has been directing beautiful music for the last 50 years, now has a new pastor who is interfering with Salamunovich and is attempting to deface the interior of the church building). In the main, though, the poor education of the priests, and the heterodox agenda of the liturgists and most supposed church musicians here, combine to prevent any deeper understanding of Scripture, Tradition and Church Authority which would be essential to true liturgical reform.
Regarding Mr. Muller’s question “What about the Anglican Use”, I am forced to point out that Los Angeles once had a church, “St. Mary of the Angels”, which was attempting to become an Anglican Use parish. I attended that church for several years, and was a member of its choir. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the late Cardinal Manning (of otherwise blessed memory), and the present Cardinal Mahony, to receive it as a Catholic Church (in spite of Vatican directives to the contrary), those who at St. Mary’s had wished to become truly Anglo-Catholic were ousted, and St. Mary’s is now a part of a splinter Anglican group.
As regards Mr. Muller’s directive that I “come back home to the Latin rite and do” my part, unfortunately, I have long ago come to the conclusion that there is no home for me to come back to. All the attempts that I have seen here to bring something of holiness and beauty to liturgical music (Dennis Fitzpatrick’s English Chant Schola or Paul Gibson’s liturgical masterpieces are just two of the attempts that come to mind) have been rejected and dismantled by the Worship and Praise song-fuehrers and the folk fascists.
I was tempted to speak of my own attempts to introduce Gregorian chant settings in English, and the opposition and rejection I received, but I do not need to: the posting on this weblog of “A Church Musician’s Lament” (originally posted on April 16, 2003, and well worth re-reading, or reading) has said it all for me.
I would prefer to spend my time worshiping in peace, and working in coordination with our choir director at St. Andrew’s, in studying and in bringing into English various slavic, greek and arabic chant traditions. I also hope that from the perspective that I have as an Eastern Catholic, I might be able to help the Latin rite, or at least, those in it who wish to help make it truly Latin and Catholic.
The Rabbi Hillel’s maxim appears appropriate at this point: “If I am not for myself, who will be? if I am not for others, what am I? and if not now, then when?” I have found that if I am not in a place where I am spiritually fed, I cannot help others. And looking around, I have found that St. Andrew’s is an oasis in what otherwise is a spiritual desert.
I am glad for Mr. Muller that he also has found a spiritual oasis; I have heard good things about Our Lady of the Atonement in San Antonio, and I fully intend on buying a DVD for myself, as well as another for a friend who would appreciate it. But as one curmudgeon to another, I suggest that we both choose the battlegrounds where there is the greatest likelihood of success. St. Andrew’s is mine. May you have good fortune in yours.
-Bernard Brandt
Mr. Brandt,
As you may know, Eastern chant is (or was in the 1990’s) quite the rage with the CIMS. I am not sure that anyone has had any success in introducing it directly into the Latin rite, though. Perhaps in the East. Obviously, my own ignorance is overwhelming.
I would like to make a few other comments if I may. They might very well not apply to you at all, as we do not know each other except for a few well-intended sentences. Anyhow, with that disclaimer out of the way …
I understand suffering inflicted by liturgical abuse very well. You will have to trust me on this as it would be disedifying and inappropriate to go into details here. Also, although I learned a lot from Francis Elborne at Our Lady of the Atonement (see if you can get their old lessons and carols CD), I have not regularly attended that church for many years and have not sung in the choir or been invited to play the organ since Mr. Elborne left a year or two ago; I sit in the nave when I visit now.
Instead, I am now involved in restarting and reorienting a parish’s music program. I can also say that the parish I recently left behind has a better music program because of the work of others and myself. I do not have a home either, but I would like to help make one for others. Although I certainly cannot give you any telephone numbers in Los Angeles, and I am very sorry to hear about Mr. Salamunovich, one of the greats of our time, there are opportunities for you to lead should that be appropriate. Let us look at that.
First, I think that we have to be convinced that we are doing the right thing, not what we like or what is fashionable — although the more deeply we learn the more deeply we love. This involves knowledge of Roman documents, and even their thankfully few internal contradictions, for correct orientation in the Latin — or Roman — rite.
Second, I think that we have to ask the Lord for guidance. I was at St. Pius X Church, where I was baptized, last weekend to teach a professional singer who knew no chant the propers for my sister’s (yes, English novus ordo) wedding, and the introit verse really jumped out at me:
Exsurgat Deus, et dissipentur inimici eius:
et fugiant, qui oderunt eum, a facie eius.
So you see that God will step in for you! Noli timere!
This is not to deny our human flaws (i.e., sinfulness and ignorance) that lead to human failures — all the time. However, once we are convinced that we are doing what the Church asks and in the way God wants us to, there really is not much choice.
Pax tecum.
Daniel Muller
St. William [the Confessor] Catholic Church
Greenville, Texas
I was delighted to discover, via your “Blogs I Read” link that Michael Gilleland is now blogging.
Always grateful to read the words of other Curmudgeons, though I prefer what I think of as the feminine version of curmudgeonry — I am a “virago” (or a “scold”, I guess, depending on ones point of view.)
Dear Mr. Muller:
My apologies for not responding earlier to your post. My only excuse is that I did not read it until today.
I am not sure who the CIMS are. Some new punk rock group? As regards faddishness regarding Roman Catholic groups regarding Eastern Catholic Churches, I know more than enough. I could tell you some stories about the Jesuits and their espousal of, and then abandonment of, the Russian Catholic Church. But that is as may be.
I am sorry as regards your unfortunate experiences regarding Western liturgies, and I applaud your reticence concerning them. To paraphrase Ludwig Wittgenstein, concerning the unspeakable, it is better to keep silent.
As regards your first point, I entirely agree: we have to know what we are doing is right, regardless of whether we like it, or whether it is popular. I believe that it is crucial to our understanding of the teachings of the Holy Spirit that we learn Scripture, Tradition, and Church Authority, and not only that we study it as an external object of study, but that we immerse ourselves in it. C.S. Lewis, near the end of his autobiography, Surprised by Joy” found useful the distinction between the contemplation of a thing (by which he meant scholarly study or examination of it from the outside) and enjoyment of a thing (by which he meant the direct experience and participation in it). While I can study Liturgy, Tradition and Patristics as an external thing, I believe that it is also necessary to participate and experience them as living things. A living western latin experience of these things in church life is all but impossible in Los Angeles. They are present in the eastern churches.
As regards your second point, yes, it is essential to seek the guidance of the Lord. Nearly twenty years ago, I prayed to the Lord for a solid month that I be given guidance as where to go. I was led to St. Andrew Church in the very week that Fr. Alexei Smith was ordained to serve the Divine Liturgy there.
It is interesting that you should mention that particular latin verse from Scripture. One of the most moving things in the Byzantine Liturgy is the beginning of the Paschal Service. In it, we file out from the church in procession around the church building, singing “Thy Resurrection, O Christ our Savior, the Angels in Heaven sing. Enable us on earth to glorify Thee in purity of heart.” We gather by the door of the church, and the priest takes the hand crucifix, and with it, hammers on the door. And the first words that he chants are just the words that you quoted: “Let God arise! Let His enemies be scattered. Let those who despise Him flee from before His face!” And we sing the Paschal Troparion: “Christ is risen from the dead, Trampling down death by death, and upon those in the tombs bestowing life!”
For these reasons, I feel convinced that this is where God wants me to be, and doing the things he wants done.
I am not sure who the CIMS are. Some new punk rock group?
Dear Mr. Brandt:
How could you know that I used to be a punker? Do not be alarmed; such things are highly diluted by the time they wash up on the Third Coast.
The CIMS is the Consociatio Internationalis Musicae Sacrae (Have you paid their dues yet?), whose American affiliate is the Church Music Association of America (Have you …. ?). I mainly referred to their 1998 Symposium, which was held at Holy Spirit University in Kaslik, Lebanon, where Father Louis Hage, OLM, one of the praesidium, lives:
“L’Esprit Saint dans la Musique Sacrée des Eglises d’Orient et d’Occident”
sous le haut patronage de
S. Em. R. Mar Nasrallah Boutros Cardinal Sfeir, Patriarche d’Antioche et de tout l’Orient pour les Maronites
Unfortunately, now that I look past the program, I cannot see where many of the addresses, on the iconographical, Byzantine, Armenian, Latin (!), Ethiopian, Syriac, and Maronite traditions, have been preserved. All that I have at hand is actually about liturgical music in China!
Blind alley? Sorry. But there is interest.
To paraphrase Ludwig Wittgenstein, …
Shh! I never in eighteen years cracked that book!
A living western latin experience of these things in church life is all but impossible in Los Angeles.
That is what I am hearing. The “pastoral letter” and recent anti-liturgical directive are infamous. Then there are those catechetical congresses (but then that nonsense is widespread …) And in a city with such fantastic heritage and patronage.
We must pray more that we pray better.
Dear Mr. Muller:
Thank you for your response. A punker, eh? I’ve jokingly spoken with my priest, Fr. Alexei, about doing a punk liturgy, for the sake of “relevancy”, with maybe a slam dance during the communion of the faithful, but for some reason he doesn’t seem to want to follow up on it. Bummer.
CIMS looks interesting. Thank you. I’ll do some more reading.
We must pray more that we pray better
Amen. Amen. Amen.
This topic is long cooled off so no one may ever see this, but I can only urge those of you in the LA area to treat yourself to St Mary of the Angels Anglican church if you long for gorgeous music lovingly and intelligently employed within traditional liturgy. Plus you get all the smells and bells and a friendly congregation.
http://www.stmaryoftheangels.org is the url.
Dear Margaret and readers:
Thank you for bringing back to memory St. Mary of the Angels in Los Angeles. I remember singing there in choir, and the lovely English plain chant, Anglican chant, and polyphony we sang there, as well as the beautiful Tridentine/Sarum liturgy served there. The people of St. Mary’s had petitioned Rome and the Los Angeles Archdiocese to be accepted as an Anglican Use Catholic Church. Rome heartily accepted; Los Angeles ignored them for years, until the people at St. Mary’s got tired of waiting, and instead became part of an Anglican splinter group. This is one of the reasons I left, alas.










Last 5 Comments