"I was robbed!"


Cradle Catholic and Gen-X revert Leila Miller tells of her journey away from and back to the Faith. While laying the blame on the “ceaseless change” element dominating our Church today, she gives glory to the grace of God that somehow delivered her from it.

Her “Catholics’ Bill of Rights” particularly struck me as fitting:

  1. You have a right to your Catholic heritage.
  2. You have the right to hear the Truth, the whole Truth and nothing but the Truth.
  3. You have the right to have the Faith of the Apostles transmitted to you unfiltered and undefiled.
  4. You have the right to be catechized by an instructor who must first be required to profess his loyalty and obedience to Rome, and who humbly submits to all the teachings of Christ through His Church. Anything less is not only nonsensical but scandalous, and might lead you away from the truth of the Church.
  5. You have the right to expect Catholic orthodoxy in all Catholic classrooms and institutions, and you have the most blessed and merciful right never to hear radical feminism or pantheism taught as if it had anything remotely to do with Catholicism.
  6. You have the right to remain Catholic. If you give up that right, it will be your free will choice and not the result of poor or scandalous catechesis. (In other words, you have the right to know what you’re leaving before you leave it.)
  7. And finally, you have the right to be indignant if you look back 28 years from now and realize that most of these rights have been denied you.

[Via The Lady in the Pew.]

Leave a Reply




*Required. E-Mail will not be published.


*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

18 Comments

Great story - thanks for the link to it.

Pax vobiscum


Peace, all.

Aside from the fact that Canon Law already enshrines an unofficial “Bill of Rights,” (somewhere around canons 210-270 I think) the writer’s assumption seems to lean toward a less mature approach to personal responsibility.

If liberal Catholicism were a cult, I would be sympathetic. But it isn’t. If traditional Catholic books had all been burned, I would be sympathetic. But they weren’t. If liberal priests and catechists slipped all the others a little pill or arranged a body-snatching, I would be sympathetic. But none of that happened.

The reality is that adult Catholics (and probably teens as well) have great freedom — as well as great responsibility — for their own growth in faith. The author describes herself as “robbed,” but the main theft was self-inflicted.

One example from her story: Her attitude toward the Hail Mary is curious and telling. She said she never learned the second half of it. Learned? Prayers are primarily for praying not learning. This is an example of an improved “Spirit of Vatican II.” Memorizing the prayer is an intellectual exercise. But it’s just the beginning. Then pray the prayer you’ve memorized. Pray it frequently; that’s what we have it for. Prayers aren’t fragile museum pieces for the memory’s shelf. They are tools to be used.

Another concern: where were her parents in all this? They seemed good enough to bring her to Mass. The parent, not the priest, not the catechist, has the primary responsibility for passing on the faith to the child. The notion that children can be dropped off to a parish school or RE class and the parents are thus off the hook is ludicrous. Her mother had the most sensible comment: explore what you are leaving before you leave it. A comment worthy of Dear Abby.

Before Vatican II, maybe people expected to be spoon-fed. I don’t know. I do recall from my own religious upbringing in the 70’s that the responsibility for living my Catholic faith was my own. Clergy weren’t going to do it for me. Teachers weren’t. It was up to me to take adult steps into faith, exploring the unknown, praying, and the whole deal.

If a person has a precious jewel and leaves it on a street corner for someone to take home, it is not robbery. It is foolishness.


This story was excellent and typical of many of our generation. Todd, you underestimate just how actively liberal Catholics strove to strip away the heritage and culture of the Church. How could our parents pass on the faith when they were being lied to by priests and nuns, when everything they were taught was being changed? And there was body snatching, the bodies (statues) of saints in my parish Church were snatched away, never to return, as it was explained in 1980: “we don’t believe in that stuff anymore.” Maybe you read theological treatises at the age of 14 but most people did not. We were robbed!


Todd - Peace. Do you really mean that - it’s a nice opening for all of your posts.

You dismiss our stories so quickly. We (Long Islander, Leila, choir director, Thomas, me and many more like us) were young, impressionable and led astray. By the GRACE OF GOD, we are back. Leila in her post and well as I (and I’m fairly sure all others) do recognize our own responsibility for our loss of faith. HOWEVER, we do share our stories in the hope that children of this generation won’t be led astray by poor catechesis as we were. We stand as a warning to all parents not to trust the education of their children SOLELY to the Church - especially those run by dissenters.

Todd - I truly have yet to understand any of your posts in any of the sites.


Cathy, I’m with you.
It is hard (was even harder before the internet,) to know and say, no, Father, you’re wrong, the Church did NOT change the rules to allow girl altar servers (I’m glad they eventually did, but I resent deeply that when it was not allowed, I was lied to by priests, and encouraged to do it.)
It’s hard for parents who are trying to do the right thing but don’t have theology degrees to say, Sister, you are wrong, we can receive on the tongue if we choose to.
It takes a lot to know that your intuition is right, that you should take your kid to confession before he makes his first communion, even though the preinciapl of your parochial school is telling you differently.
It is not easy to say, sorry, you are wrong, Bishop, the Vatican Council did NOT say we were not allowed to sing Latin hymns any more.
It is hard when one teacher tells you the virgin birth is a pious myth, and a lecturer say that the resurrection can be thought of as purely metaphorical, and that the Blessed sacrament clearly isn’t “really” flesh and blood, to know that even though youre sitting in a classroom in a nominally Catholic school, what you are being taught is NOT Catholicism.

We were lied to and misinformed by people we had been taught to trust.

To say it is our fault is like blaming the victims of sexual abuse for not knowing any better.

Some liturgists and some priests and some bishops are still lying to us about the Faith and the Liturgy among a host of other things, but we are getting the tools to find the information to call them one their lies.


Very well said Benny.


Peace, Cathy.

I try to mean it, yes.

I’m not unaware that people have been misled by the Church and some of its members or leaders. Though exasperated, I truly am sympathetic to this author. But I’ve known Catholics who have been misled by people of a traditionalist stripe as well. Assumptions placed on them such as: divorced (and not unmarried) people not welcome in the sacramental life, verbal or emotional abuse in the confessional, etc.. Such experiences do not undercut yours and others. But they do point out that misleading the innocent is a transgression committed not just be liberals. It is a human sinful trait, not monpolized by any sub-sect. Yours is not the only “victimization.”

The disadvantage of having a strongly obedient sensibility is that such a person will be prone to being misled by authority. The more I encounter it, the more I find uppity Catholic traditionalists refreshing. A faithful (as I hope I was) rebel is well placed to doubt and question and employ common sense.

Adult (and probably teen) Catholics desperately need to take responsibility for their own faith lives. That was an attitude I picked up from my parents (neither Catholic) I suppose. If I find something spiritually troubling, I don’t shy away from it. I wrestle with it.

Parents need to take responsibility on behalf of their children as well. After our adoption, my wife and I began to take our responsibility of child-rearing for faith very seriously. I’m pleased my daughter knows a few memorized prayers, participates at Mass, can pray spontaneously, and prays several times a day. She also goes to a Catholic school. But the primary responsibility is my own — at least until she’s much older. I wouldn’t dream of falling back on her teachers and catechists, however much I respect the individuals I work with at the parish.

I agree with Long Islander: the story was typical. But it was still sad. And it makes me very critical of the author’s parents for so carelessly and completely abdicating their child’s faith development. The “Hail Mary” part of the story just slew me. A child should know that prayer before First Communion, and should be praying it daily. My parents weren’t Catholic and even I knew that.


Well, Todd, you are a real self-made man. No Catholic culture or structure for you.

A fellow poster out there described how his kid was taught to cross herself saying “O Great White spirit.” He had to correct that right on the spot. Thank Goodness for his vigilance against Satan inspired liberalism.

Todd how dare you accuse the author of having a stale attitude regarding the Ave Maria?


Peace, Tom.

I think my point is brought out well by your tale: it is the responsibility of the parent to teach the Sign of the Cross and the Hail Mary. I take seriously the culture of the Catholic home above everything but the Mass as a value for raising good Catholic children. I’m curious over your antagonism to my suggestion of parental responsibility. My mother wasn’t even Catholic and she made sure we were reared in our adopted faith. Am I wrong in assuming this should be a given?


Todd -

I knew you were going to respond with that but the bottom line is that attendance in the CCD is MANDATORY to make First Communion.

So your “do it yourself” mentality is not germane to the Catholic Church.

I don’t view the CCD teachers as far off Church officials. They are my neighbors who attend my Church. I do expect them to teach my child CORRECTLY.

The author is pointing out that she was not taught CORRECTLY. She did not get the content. When teachers , of any sort, just try to stand up there and convey emotion it just does not work. You can’t remember emotions, you can’t get TRAINED with emotions.

You’ll also get blown out of the water the first time you run into an Evangelical, most of whom, know the Bible cold! They also know their own spin on the Bible. And they also tend to know how to criticize your Church in an attempt to proseletyze you.

Catholics are being picked off left and right. The Masses are empty, half the missing are at home in a stupor in front of television the other half are at the Church accross the street.

The author of the article is describing how she was left defenseless and spiritually orphaned.

You seem like a knowledgeable guy…I think GEN X’ers are striving toward knowledge…and they have to start at about where a 1950s 5th Grader is at …That was the retarded nature of the 1970s Experiment.


Tom, you are speaking for me and doing a good job.


Peace, Tom.

I don’t think we’re that far from agreement on things Catholic. I would agree that much child catechesis in schools and in RE is poor. But that’s no excuse for a child not knowing the Hail Mary or the Sign of the Cross. That is a parent’s responsibility — not a catechist’s, not the priest’s. The fact that “CCD” or whatever may be “mandatory” is irrelevant. If I thought my daughter was getting religious education short shrift, I would still set her straight. It would be my and my wife’s responsibility. I remain critical of this author’s parents.

My approach has less to do with “do-it-yourself” (whatever you mean by that) than with taking responsibility.

I understand and appreciate the author “felt” defenseless and orphaned. Not everyone who was catechized in the 1970’s is cut from this mold. Lots are, I grant you. But I still take exception to the catechism fix-it approach of catechists just teaching everything by the book and thinking it will work.

I suspect you are close to correct about people being at a child level of faith. My take on both pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II Catholics is that most should be starting after 2nd grade. Certainly, we need more thoughtful Catholic adults than the Catholic minimalists of any and all generations running around today. And we need less victimhood all around.


Todd-

For the record…(ref. your & my second to last paragraph & I did not use the verb “felt”..I used the verb “left.”

You chide us for blaming the Church..yet you want to blame the parents…

Maybe our parents forgot one very important thing…a thing that my foreign born wife reminded me of yesterday…American is NOT a Catholic country…it is a Protestant one.


Tom, I am not sure I would even agree that the US is a Protestant country — then at least it would be Christian.
It is a secular country, or as pagan as it is anything else.
It worships fame, wealth, convenience and entertainment.


My comment was intended to address religious practice. I attribute no negative connation to the adjective “Protestant.” Its defining characteristic is, of course, that it is not Catholic.

All this is related to our discussion of Catholic orthodoxy/expectations of the Church/ expectations of parents.

The general ills of society, of course, stand on their own and certainly merit the description “pagan.”


Peace, Tom.

I have no wish to “blame the parents” in any general sense. I criticized one particular person’s parents for not teaching her the Hail Mary and the Sign of the Cross. The author’s ignorance of basic Catholic heritage rests primarily (though not exclusively) with parents.

I have seen too many parents neglect Sunday Mass, yet see that their children are dropped off for weekly babysitting at RE (or seven-hour day care in the parish school). The fault is not in any way with progressives or traditionalists, but with people who abdicate their responsibility as the primary guides for their children’s spiritual lives. May I ask if you disagree with parental responsibility?


Nope. My parish has 300 children enrolled in CCD and I guestimate about 20 are brought to Mass. (There are 4 Masses per weekend and you’re likely to see 5 kids there.)

I guess it would be easy to slam my parents but there’s a commandment about that.

One would expect a parish CCD teacher as a back-stop against heresy/unorthodoxy.

Looks like the gates are wide open as far as bringing scandal to the little ones.


At our parish, the parents of kids in the parochial school sign a pledge that they will take them to obligatory masses.
If they are not in the parish, or not Catholic, they make separate arrangements.
This year weekly “envelopes” were printed up for the entire school population that is actually nominally members of the parish, not to hold monetary donations, but to write on what “gift” you had given God (or one of His people) that week (helping mom without being asked, being in children’s choir, being nice to a new kid in school, etc.)
Well, parents, rightly, realized that this was also a way to check on attendance, and you should have heard the foul language any number of parents unleashed on our very sweet, mild-mannered, soft-spoken DRE, it was not of her g– d– business whether my kid goes to Mass, no m– f— teacher is going to tell me how I have to spend my weekends (note, they had all signed the pledge, previously.)
Father is going to take over the job of contacting people who are not living up to their end of their agreement, because the poor woman was just about done in by the confrontations.


A Musical Journey through GIRM