"The Day the Music Died"
Mark Sullivan gives the heartbreaking details of a parish liturgy’s disintegration.
[Fr.] Mayo favors a more modern approach to the worship service, or liturgy, calling for more participation by the congregation, including additional singing by worshippers. His disagreement with Applegate [the choirmaster] surfaced during the summer in memos to the choir director.
Specifically, Mayo requested two things: an entrance hymn that the entire assembly—not just the choir—could sing, and a psalm to which the congregation responds that comes between readings from the Old Testament and New Testament. The psalm would replace a section that the choir sang by itself. Mayo permitted the language of the hymn and the psalm to be in any language, even Latin, he said.
But Applegate viewed the changes as striking at the heart of his choir’s mission, and rather than agree to them, ended his run at St. Patrick’s.
“I’ve never compromised about that, ever,” he said. “Not ever. And it probably isn’t time for me to start.
“My struggle over the years has been to protect the heritage of Catholic sacred music,” he said. “This was our raison d’etre. But I was powerless. My only power was to say ‘No, I won’t do what you’re telling me to do.’ ” [Read on...]
Sad. Assuming that this Mass was according to the 1969 rubrics:
- couldn’t the Simple Gradual have been used for the entrance song and the responsorial psalm, while retaining the propers from the Roman Gradual for the offertory and communion?
- Couldn’t the Mass Ordinary have been taught to the assembly, retaining the polyphonic settings for solemnities and feasts?
- Could a composer elaborate on the foundation the Simple Gradual sets—retaining the simple Roman plainsong antiphon for choir and assembly, while polyphonically setting the verses a la Gregorio Allegri’s majestic Miserere?
- Could this have been done in steps, while all involved took the time to really discuss and understand the reforms promoted by Vatican II in light of the different views that Fr. Mayo, Mr. Applegate and members of the parish brought to the table?
Instead, a vacuum has been created, one that will most likely be filled by claptrap promoted by the big three publishing houses. Kinda brings a tear to the eye.
Update: Or an egg to the face. Or a foot in the mouth. Rumors of the death of good music and the Latin Mass at St. Patrick’s are greatly exaggerated. Forgive me for assuming incorrectly.
Update #2: And yet, the argument is still made that things were better the way they were. One thing’s for certain—the Big Three have struck this parish—just not in the way assumed by many.
Leave a Reply
4 Comments
Unfortunately, after reading the article I think the priest was at least trying to do the right thing. Anyone who’s read the docs, as you and I both have, Aristotle, should have been able to come up with ways to involve the congregation more. The fact that some of the members were being paid and some other stuff in the article makes it seem like the choir wasn’t so much an integral part of the parish as an honored guest. That’s not what it’s about.
After reading the article I can only hope that music directors could be better educated and better informed as to the nature of liturgy and the role of the Church. The music director sounds stuck in his ways, and his “I won’t do…” sounds like someone else’s “I will not serve.”
Well, music, indeed beautiful, is the servant of the liturgy. The Pastor was well within his rights. What he was asking for could have easily been accomplished in Latin with the Graduale simplex without sacrificing any of the beauty.
And indeed if the successor is the claptrap you mention, the musician in the story is just as responsible as the Pastor.
Gentlemen - Good points, all.
After rereading the article it has become clear to me that Fr. Mayo does not desire the vacuum to be filled with claptrap. He does say that he loves chant, and admires the work the choir has done.
I do wonder if any of the parties involved were familiar with the Graduale Simplex. I’m increasingly convinced of the truth of Dr. Bill Ford’s statement referring to the Graduale Simplex as the “Rosetta Stone” or golden key that unlocks the Council’s intentions regarding music in the liturgy.
I also wonder exactly what kind of music, if any, has replaced the Gregorian Propers and Ordinary at this particular Mass.
From what I understand, Fr. Mayo is high handed in his dealings as a priest. Moreover, the Latin Mass at St. Patrick’s was on a Saturday evening at 7:30 p.m.–not a typical time for Sunday worship. It was special and 100 people attended at a parish that was going to be closed prior to the Cantores arrival.
So what that it violated some rubrics handed down by a committee at the Vatican. Maybe Bugnini shouldn’t have written the rubrics in such a way as to restrict the choir and thus inhibit the performance (yes, performance) of the Church’s traditional music. For, in fact, isn’t that what’s happened. Choirs, pipe organs, Gregorian chant and polyphony have all been suppressed and all in the name of Vatican II.
In Europe, it is common for choirs to sing the ordinary and proper alone. Here, if the choir sings anything alone it’s a huge deal. I’m with Mr. Applegate. The Church should back up something beautiful and traditional rather than indulge in Reformation-style destruction.










Last 5 Comments